Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01536 12
Original file (01536 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
7015S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

TUR
Docket No: 1536-12
27 November 2012

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 20 November 2012. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your
allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance
with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy on 18 May 1970 and immediately began a
period of active duty. You served without disciplinary incident
until 30 September 1971 when you received nonjudicial punishment
(NJP) for a five day period of unauthorized absence (UA).

During the period from 10 to 26 June 1972 you were in a UA status
for three days. You were also admitted to a drug rehabilitation
program where you disclosed the wrongful usage of dangerous
drugs, specifically, marijuana, amphetamines, barbiturates,
lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), and hallucinogens, and advised
that administrative processing action was being initiated due to
your drug abuse. On 6 July 1972 you were convicted by special
court-martial (SPCM) of a 53 day period of UA and were sentenced
to confinement at hard labor for a month, a $384 forfeiture of
pay, reduction to paygrade E-1, and a bad conduct discharge
(BCD). On 14 November 1972 you received NJP for wrongful
possession of marijuana.
On 15 January 1973 you received your third NUP for two periods of
absence from your appointed place of duty. Subsequently, the BCD
was approved at all levels of review, and on 21 November 1973 you
were so discharged.

Your record reflects that on 17 March 1976, in accordance with a
recommendation of the Presidential Clemency Board, your BCD was
changed and you were awarded a clemency discharge pursuant to
Presidential Proclamation 4313.

The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your post service conduct and desire to upgrade your clemency
discharge. Nevertheless, these factors were not sufficient to
warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of the
seriousness of your repetitive and lengthy periods of UA and
repeated use of dangerous drugs, all of which resulted in three
NIJPs and a court-martial conviction. Further, the Board noted
that the BCD was changed to a clemency discharge, but concluded
that a further change was not warranted. Accordingly, your
application has been denied.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,
BRIAN J. GEORGE
Head, Discharge Review Section

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04170-11

    Original file (04170-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08002-08

    Original file (08002-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2009. Documentary Material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. , Finally, the Board noted that you were issued a clemency discharge under the provisions of PP-4313, but concluded that a further change, which would make you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05774-11

    Original file (05774-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2012. The Board found that during the period from 24 January to 18 September 1973, you received five nonjudicial punishments (NJP’s) for unauthorized absence (UA), two instances of wrongful possession of marijuana, introduction of marijuana onboard ship, six instances of being absent from your appointed place of duty, insubordinate conduct, disobedience,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04611-04

    Original file (04611-04.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 March 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13180-09

    Original file (13180-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01537-11

    Original file (01537-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 9 August 1973 you were ‘convicted by special court-martial (SPCM) of three periods of UA totalling 27 days and sentenced to confinement at hard labor for two months, a $408 forfeiture of pay, and a bad conduct discharge {BCD}. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03454-02

    Original file (03454-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. requesting execution of my bad conduct discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00327-01

    Original file (00327-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, during the seven month period from March 1973 to October 1973 you received four nonjudicial punishments ( N J P ) and were convicted by a summary court-martial. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05727-00

    Original file (05727-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your record reflects that on 30 April 1973 you The Board found you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 12 July 1972 at the age of 19. received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for a two day period of unauthorized absence (UA) and were awarded a $50 forfeiture of pay, which was suspended. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10463-02

    Original file (10463-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 19 January 1973 you were convicted by SPCM of two periods of UA totalling three days, You were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for two months, a $300 forfeiture of pay, and a bad conduct discharge (BCD). On...